about mchi*
Yasuhiro Mochizuki, or simply mchi*, is the pseudonym of a twenty-something year old STEM student studying Information Technology, polyglot, tea addicted, and indie loving sarcastic arsehole. Yasuhiro is the epitome of sporadic and expects nothing from themselves and encourages others to do the same. Perpetually stirring shite up for the giggles of it all, chronically depressed, and a massive synaesthetic being, Yasuhiro works way too much to be actually existing and it’s genuinely surprising they are actively living. Left-leaning but hates leftist American politics. A massive introvert that actually hates people more than they probably should despite being able to empathsize and sympathsize with them to an extent. Unexplicable goth royalty and the secondary softest hinedere™ that is often found between Apathetic Ave and a trash bin. Stop Yasu from being a shitelord by sending them money to buy tea. This biography may or may not be filled with lies and exaggerations. Good luck deciphering where it falls and welcome to the blog! ♡
transparency and such.
As of recently, it has been decided that mchiblogs* will rarely ever take requests for reviews or brand sponsorship unless the product or brand is something that is truly loved by the blogger and would reflect the attitude and personality of the blog. That said, in the off-chance that there is a case where mchiblogs* does accept a product for review or a sponsorship, this tidbit is created to, as the title insinuates, allows for clear and open transparency. There may, on occasion, be an affiliate link or links in a post or a review for a product sent for the blog; however, these things will be disclosed immediately and multiple times within the post or somewhere on the blog. Any content curated for and including aformentioned links and brands are not influenced by any one, thing, or entity outside of the blog’s owner. Opinions, views, and how they are stated are that of the blog and the blogger’s and has no baring on the company or product unless stated otherwise. Opinions and views are completely subjective, should not be taken as gospel, or used as the only source of “credible” information even if there are tinges of objective information provided. This blog nor its sponsors are liable for how you, the reader, absorb, handle, and accept the information provied to you nor are they liable if something were to happen in the event that you decide to follow the words and opinions found here. Not everything works for everyone and, while recommendations are given, it is not anyone’s place to be a keeper of any sort for any person. Currently, this section is a bit of a work in progress but if there are questions, comments, or concerns, feel free to send an email and you’ll get a response almost immediately.
blog categories & series.
Please be patient with me while I work on this section.
favourite reads.
Please be patient with me while I work on this section.
blog license & credits.
Currently, this blog is protected under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. This means that the content found here is available for sharing, adapting, building upon, transforming, and remixing; however, with certain guidelines that have to be followed. Appropriate credit must be given at all times, even if the content has been adapted, built upon, transformed, or remixed. Credit given must not be given in a way that assumes that mchiblogs* and its owner endorses you, the borrower, or your opinions. The content found here is not for commerical usage outside of this blog and/or without proper permission given. Basically, no making money off the work found here. Finally, if the content here is remixed, transformed, or built upon, they have to be shared under the same license and noted as such. For more information on this license, go here. see the credits.
Yasuhiro. 24. Sporadic blogger & timelapse YouTuber. Tea drinker. Indie trash. Unapologetic. read more....
social media!
the archivals!
recent posts
by the month
all the labels
subscribe to the channel!
a member of...!
Stream of Consciousness #02 | Disliking vs Dismissing Content?
Today’s post is a post that I actually have been sitting on doing for quite some time. It initially stemmed from a couple tweets I had seen in passing and I felt passionate enough at the time to want to have a chat about it. In the end, though, I felt that the topic, at that point in time, wasn’t worth commenting on in as large of a manner as my blog posts tend to do.

Fast forward to now and I feel that now is a good time to actually address this topic from my perspective and then lay it to rest finally. I will openly admit that a couple of blog posts and tweets that I had seen fly across my timeline inspired my want to talk about this again, but it isn’t exactly directed at anyone. More than anything, it’s directed towards an idea and the negative aspect of said ideal that people tend to overlook.

I will be the first to admit that there are some blog post types and genres that I absolutely cannot stand and will actively ignore blogs for that reason. Seriously, I almost always avoid photo-only based blogs and while I do accept them—because it’s rude to turn away someone’s good will—I actually actively avoid “award” posts. There’s a reason I, almost always, break the chain when it comes to “award” posts.

So obviously, I have no qualms about people disliking or feeling some type of way about a particular type of content because that’s just how people work. Sometimes things vibe with you, other times they don’t. However, my problem lies when people make the things they dislike seem they should be a revolutionary dislike, pet peeve, or annoyance.

The thing is, that is so dismissive. And yes, even coming from a good place, it’s dismissive.

Now, let’s clear something up real quick. There are blog content types that are ridiculously popular and continue to grow in popularity at an alarming rate. While this is normal for blogging as a whole—look at when MySpace blogs were a thing and blog tags were popular and then they suddenly now have a resurgence in the shape of “awards”—it can seem a bit suspect if this is something that you’ve really gotten into in recent times. And while there is a reason for it, it can get annoying and it can seem a bit skeevy. That said, it doesn’t make the content any less valid.

And that’s what is really my issue with the argument that certain types of blog posts are only created because they are popular, it dismisses the validity of the content and how is that fair in any way?

How is it fair that you can sit here and question the validity of others’ content? In what universe do you have an excuse to say that popularity is the only reason for someone to post a particular type of content? Isn’t it ignoring the fact that maybe some people feel more confident introducing a particular type of content to their blog when they see that others get a decent response to their own version of that same content?

We speak so much about wanting our fellow bloggers to be confident, happy, and content with the content they produce and release but we are the people that knock down our fellow bloggers the most when it suits our fancy.
(And note, I’m using we as a general plural and am aware that this doesn’t go for everyone.)

The popularity of content doesn’t subtract away validity from content. If it doesn’t work in the real world, why would it work in the Blogosphere? Why are we perpetuating this ideal? And what makes the people perpetuating this ideal so special? Because let’s be real, we’re all followers, to some extent, and there’s nothing wrong with that. There’s nothing wrong with drawing from what is popular and trying to apply it to yourself, your content, your personality, and your content.

But maybe I just view the world differently. Admittedly, I’m apathetic towards most things and do not understand why people care so much about how people choose approach certain things.

How do you feel on this subject? Leave a comment below and we can chat about it! I’m always interested in different perspectives and finding out why people feel certain ways about certain topics. ♡

Labels: ,